Diverse Opinions on the Series 'Plevako': Praise and Critique
"Plevako" and Domestic Cinematography: Why Praise and Criticism Diverge
The Russian series "Plevako" has sparked a whirlwind of reactions from viewers, leading to sharply divided opinions. On one hand, there is criticism targeting the production quality, acting performance, and historical accuracy; while on the other hand, some viewers express admiration for the artistic choices and talent of the crew. Let's delve into the key points that have ignited passionate debates.
Bezrukov in the Leading Role: Familiar Face or Predictability?
One of the central topics of discussion has been the involvement of Sergey Bezrukov in the main role. Many viewers noted that his presence inherently sets a tone for the series. Remarks like "Bezrukov in the credits—time to switch off" have become emblematic of the audience's fatigue over his frequent appearances in popular Russian projects.
However, amidst the critiques, there are positive appraisals. For example, a user from Cherepovets named Vyacheslav praised Bezrukov's performance, stating, "Good movie. Bezrukov is magnificent!"
Historical Accuracy: How Crucial is Realism?
A significant amount of criticism has been directed towards the lack of adherence to historical facts. For instance, a scene in which the protagonist performs a pagan ritual of burning his mother shocked even the most loyal viewers. Vyacheslav’s commentary encapsulates the prevailing sentiment: "The series does NOTHING to grab attention. Bezrukov mumbles his lines, it’s all a muddle in his mouth."
Conversely, some viewers argue that creative license is permissible. "If you seek maximum accuracy, 'Wikipedia is crying for you'," advises Nikolai, suggesting that the project should be regarded as an entertaining series rather than a historical chronicle.
Comparisons with Western Productions
Frequently, "Plevako" is compared to its foreign counterparts. Certain viewers claim that it attempts to emulate films from Guy Ritchie. "I’m pleased to note that our creatives have finally watched Guy Ritchie’s 'Sherlock Holmes'," sarcastically remarks one viewer. Nevertheless, another user counters, stating that such imitation isn’t always justified: "'Gangs of New York' is a good film, but calling it historical is a stretch. Why shouldn’t we carve our own path?"
Costumes, Direction, and Script: The Project’s Strengths
Despite the critiques, the series undeniably showcases commendable aspects. For instance, Tatiana writes, "I applaud the director, screenwriters, actors, and costume designers with standing ovation!" In her view, the project successfully blends drama, action, and elements of historical narrative.
The Character of Plevako: Charisma or Manipulation?
The portrayal of lawyer Fyodor Plevako ignites further debate. Evgeny labels him as a "hyped empty shell and manipulator," criticizing his emotional appeals to the jury instead of focusing on facts. However, experienced attorneys like Eduard K. disagree, stating, "He acted within the offered circumstances. If such manipulations worked back then, why not use them?"
The End: To Watch or Not to Watch?
"Plevako"* is a project that has triggered extensive discussions owing to its ambiguous artistic and historical decisions. For those in search of light entertainment, it could be an engaging choice. However, viewers who anticipate a deep dive into historical reality are likely to feel let down. As one astute commentator aptly pointed out: *"If you want to simply watch a series without much mental strain, it will satisfy your cravings."
Question to the Viewers
What are your thoughts on the blend of artistic fiction and historical events in series? Share your insights!